Monday, December 13, 2010

Day 13- Movie 9. Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (2010)

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World was like a breath of fresh air. So many movies are just slight variations of films that have come before. I can't tell you how many movies I watch where I feel like I've already seen it before. I don't think anyone could describe this movie as boring or predictable. This is a unique, interesting, creative, video-gamesque film that certainly approaches the genre from a new angle. I heard director Edgar Wright describe this film as a musical, but instead of breaking into song, they break into fights. I think that's a very appropriate description.

And yet, moviegoers mostly stayed away from this film. It only generated $31 million at the box office, not even in the top 50 of 2010. Why is that? Was it TOO unique and different for audiences? Were people sick of Michael Cera being Michael Cera in every film? Was it the advertising? I don't know, but I feel sad that this film was viewed as such a box office bomb.

I admit that this isn't the most accessible film. You really have to completely give yourself over to it or it's too easy to dismiss as silly, distracting, and unfocused. The film may be those things, but looking at it from a high level view, it's almost a beautiful mosaic of some of the craziest, stylish, retro concepts you can imagine. It's impressive how so much is weaved together in a coherent plot. The film is entertaining and funny, and I really enjoyed watching it. (by the way, is there a better line in the entire film than "It's milk and eggs, bitch."?)

Scott Pilgrim vs. the World is a movie that I believe audiences will appreciate more as time goes on. Maybe it was too polarizing, maybe it was ahead of its time (maybe I'm wrong, and it sucked?). Regardless, I thoroughly enjoyed it, and consider it one of the most entertaining films of 2010. It's not perfect, but I'd rate this movie a solid 7.5/10.

Why do you think audiences stayed away? Has anyone else seen this movie? Am I wrong about it, or is this indeed an under-appreciated gem?

No comments:

Post a Comment